https://wiki.vg/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=F0X&feedformat=atomwiki.vg - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T12:53:12ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.34.4https://wiki.vg/index.php?title=Talk:Java_Edition_Cheats&diff=16655Talk:Java Edition Cheats2021-05-30T12:57:16Z<p>F0X: /* Should be removed or rewritten */</p>
<hr />
<div>== This article is not neutral ==<br />
<br />
While I can fix the non neutrallity within the article, there is an inherent issue with this article as when we include "Cheats" (most commonly known as modified clients) we should include ANY modified client as otherwise it wouldn't make much sense [[User:Geolykt|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt|talk]])<br />
<br />
== Should be removed or rewritten ==<br />
<br />
This article is complete bs, why does it even exist? It lists a few random clients and makes claims about the "most propular" ones. There is little to no useful information in this. [[User:F0X|F0X]] ([[User talk:F0X|talk]]) 12:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)</div>F0Xhttps://wiki.vg/index.php?title=Talk:Java_Edition_Cheats&diff=16654Talk:Java Edition Cheats2021-05-30T12:55:46Z<p>F0X: /* Should be removed or rewritten */</p>
<hr />
<div>== This article is not neutral ==<br />
<br />
While I can fix the non neutrallity within the article, there is an inherent issue with this article as when we include "Cheats" (most commonly known as modified clients) we should include ANY modified client as otherwise it wouldn't make much sense [[User:Geolykt|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt|talk]])<br />
<br />
== Should be removed or rewritten ==<br />
<br />
This article is complete bs, why does it even exist? It lists a few random clients and makes claims about the "most propular" ones. There is little to no useful information in this. - [[User:F0X|F0X]], 2021-05-30</div>F0Xhttps://wiki.vg/index.php?title=Talk:Java_Edition_Cheats&diff=16653Talk:Java Edition Cheats2021-05-30T12:52:39Z<p>F0X: /* Should be removed or rewritten */ new section</p>
<hr />
<div>== This article is not neutral ==<br />
<br />
While I can fix the non neutrallity within the article, there is an inherent issue with this article as when we include "Cheats" (most commonly known as modified clients) we should include ANY modified client as otherwise it wouldn't make much sense [[User:Geolykt|Geolykt]] ([[User talk:Geolykt|talk]])<br />
<br />
== Should be removed or rewritten ==<br />
<br />
This article is complete bs, why does it even exist? It lists a few random clients and makes claims about the "most propular" ones. There is little to no useful information in this.</div>F0X